LOGIN
|
REGISTER
Wednesday, October 9, 2024
Home
Summaries
Country Summary
Site of Action Summary
Site of Action Table
ALS Mutation Database
Graphs
Chronological Increase in USA
Saving Graphs for PowerPoint
Multiple Resistance within Populations
Weeds Resistant to Many SOA's
Global Maps
Chronological Increase
Resistance by Site of Action
Graph Data for Resistance by SOA
Resistance by SOA listing species
Resistance by SOA and Crop
Resistance by Weed Family
Weed Families by # SOA
Top 15 Weed Species by # SOA
Lifecycle Duration for Resistant Weeds vs Weeds in General
Top 15 Herbicides to Select Resistance
ALS inhibitor mutations
ALS inhibitor Mutations - Residue #
#Herbicides for each of the Top 15 SOA's
Recent Additions
Select Multiple Resistance by Country
Resistant Weeds
By Species
By Crop
By Country
By Herbicide Site of Action
By Individual Herbicide
Add New Case
Add New Case of Resistance
Criterion for Confirmation
Herbicides
Herbicide Classification System
Herbicides by Site of Action
Herbicide Poster
Researchers
Login
Log Out
Edit Your Contact Details
Find Researchers
Register as Researcher
Email me my Password
Change my Password
Literature
Search Reference Database
Add a Document
Add a Reference
E-Books
Herbicide Resistant Phalaris minor in Wheat - India
Management of Resistant Weeds in Rice
Prevención y manejo de malezas resistentes a herbicidas en arroz
Help
About US
FAQ
FAQ
Login
FAQ
About Us
Cite this Site
Add New Case
Add Documents
Summaries
US State Map
European Map
Recent Cases
Countries
Sites of Action
All Species by SOA Table
Herbicides
Glyphosate Resistant Weeds
ALS Mutation Database
Sequence Database
Graphs
Global Maps
Herbicide Poster
Herbicide Classification System
Resistant Weeds
By Site of Action
By Crop
By Species
By Country
By Individual Herbicide
Membership
Register
Retrieve Your Password
Edit Your Contact Details
Change Your Password
Contacts
Researchers
Contact Us
Search the Herbicide-Resistance Reference Database
Searches the reference database - authors, title, abstract, and keywords fields. Not case sensitive.
You can use
AND, OR, AND NOT
operators. For instance :
Tranel and Amaranthus and not glyphosate
REFERENCES
1
Page size:
select
5
10
20
50
Page:
of 1
Items
1
to
1
of
1
M. Heravi, J. Gherekhloo, A. Siahmarguee, H. Kazemi, S. Hassanpour- Bourkheili
.
2020
.
Investigating the Resistance of Winter Wild Oat Biotypes to ACCase Inhibitor Herbicide in Wheat Fields of Ramian County
.
Journal of Plant Protection
34
:
385 - 399
.
Introduction: Weeds are wild plant species which grow in agricultural ecosystems and compete with crops for resources such as water, nutrients, light, and space. Wild oat is reported as one of the most troublesome autumn weeds in croplands and its dominant species in Iran is winter wild oat (Avena ludoviciana Dur.). Herbicide resistance is the inherent ability of a weed biotype in survival after being exposed to a rate of herbicide which would be lethal to the wild type species. In the recent years, there have been several reports on the occurrence of herbicide resistance in Golestan province. The following research was conducted to identify the ACCase- resistant winter wild oat biotypes and generation of distribution map for the resistant biotypes in wheat fields of Ramian Township. Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted in 2017-2018 at the greenhouse and Weed Science laboratory of Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. Plant material included 80 putatively resistant winter wild oat biotypes which were collected from 100 wheat fields of Ramian Township. The susceptible biotype was also collected from the regions with no history of herbicide spray. Three Acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase) inhibiting herbicides including clodinafop propargyl, fenoxaprop-P ethyl, and diclofop methyl which are common graminicides applied in wheat fields of the country were used to confirm the occurrence of resistance in winter wild oat biotypes. Three herbicides including pinoxaden, clethodim, and haloxyfop-R methyl ester were also applied on the biotypes as the possible alternative herbicides. First the winter wild oat seeds were hulled by hand. To obtain a more uniform germination, the seeds were placed in 9 cm Petri dishes topped with a filter paper and 2.5 mL of distilled water was added to the Petri dishes. Then, the Petri dishes were transferred to a refrigerator with a temperature of 4-5°C under darkness conditions. After pre-chilling, the petri dishes were incubated at the room temperature to germinate. To perform the discriminating concentration, pre- screening and concentration- response assays, 10 pre- germinated seeds from each biotype were placed on the Petri dishes as described above, then were treated with various concentrations of the mentioned herbicides. Three Petri dishes were used for each concentration, with each Petri dish serving as a replicate. Also, the Petri dishes treated with distilled water were regarded as control. The Petri dishes were kept at the room temperature for seven days and then the length of their coleoptile was measured. Four parametered log-logistic function was fitted to the data using R software (drc package). ArcGis V.10.3 was used to generate the distribution map of the herbicide- resistant biotypes. Results and Discussion: Results of the present study indicate the confirmation of resistance to clodinafop propargyl, fenoxaprop-P ethyl, and diclofop methyl herbicides in 58 out of 80 winter wild oat biotypes gathered from wheat fields of Ramian Township. Resistance factor to clodinafop propargyl, fenoxaprop-P ethyl, and diclofop methyl herbicides were 48.69 to >851.33, 52.57 to >752.57, and 310.27 to >1443.90, respectively. For further investigation on the response of these resistant biotypes, three herbicides including pinoxaden, clethodim, and haloxyfop-R methyl ester were applied on the biotypes as a Petri dish assay. Two biotypes with the highest resistance factors (ram1, ram18) and two with the lowest resistance factors (ram15, ram4) were selected for this assay. In the haloxyfop-R methyl ester treatment, the highest and lowest resistance factors were observed in ram1 with 423.35 and ram15 with 284.50, respectively. In the other two herbicide however, resistance factor had no significant difference with the value 1. Application of herbicides possessing different modes of action may lead to elimination of both susceptible and resistant biotypes. However, this will serve as a new selective pressure which will eventually result in intensification of resistance and furthermore, evolution of cross and multiple- resistant species. Thus, meticulous application of integrated weed management methods are of great importance to prevent or delay the evolution of resistance to herbicides. Conclusion: Implementation of cultural methods for weed management and preventing the distribution of herbicides to which the weeds have readily developed resistance will lead to reduction of selective pressure. Adoption of crop and herbicide rotation principles will serve as a tool to debilitate the weed in competition with the crop, which in long term may contribute to reduced frequency of resistant alleles
1
Page size:
select
5
10
20
50
Page:
of 1
Items
1
to
1
of
1
PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FIRST if you intend to base a significant portion of a scientific paper on data derived from this site.
Cite this site as:
Heap, I. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Online. Internet.
Wednesday, October 9, 2024
. Available
www.weedscience.org
Copyright � 1993-
2024
WeedScience.org All rights reserved. Fair use of this material is encouraged. Proper citation is requested.
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##