LOGIN
|
REGISTER
Wednesday, October 9, 2024
Home
Summaries
Country Summary
Site of Action Summary
Site of Action Table
ALS Mutation Database
Graphs
Chronological Increase in USA
Saving Graphs for PowerPoint
Multiple Resistance within Populations
Weeds Resistant to Many SOA's
Global Maps
Chronological Increase
Resistance by Site of Action
Graph Data for Resistance by SOA
Resistance by SOA listing species
Resistance by SOA and Crop
Resistance by Weed Family
Weed Families by # SOA
Top 15 Weed Species by # SOA
Lifecycle Duration for Resistant Weeds vs Weeds in General
Top 15 Herbicides to Select Resistance
ALS inhibitor mutations
ALS inhibitor Mutations - Residue #
#Herbicides for each of the Top 15 SOA's
Recent Additions
Select Multiple Resistance by Country
Resistant Weeds
By Species
By Crop
By Country
By Herbicide Site of Action
By Individual Herbicide
Add New Case
Add New Case of Resistance
Criterion for Confirmation
Herbicides
Herbicide Classification System
Herbicides by Site of Action
Herbicide Poster
Researchers
Login
Log Out
Edit Your Contact Details
Find Researchers
Register as Researcher
Email me my Password
Change my Password
Literature
Search Reference Database
Add a Document
Add a Reference
E-Books
Herbicide Resistant Phalaris minor in Wheat - India
Management of Resistant Weeds in Rice
Prevención y manejo de malezas resistentes a herbicidas en arroz
Help
About US
FAQ
FAQ
Login
FAQ
About Us
Cite this Site
Add New Case
Add Documents
Summaries
US State Map
European Map
Recent Cases
Countries
Sites of Action
All Species by SOA Table
Herbicides
Glyphosate Resistant Weeds
ALS Mutation Database
Sequence Database
Graphs
Global Maps
Herbicide Poster
Herbicide Classification System
Resistant Weeds
By Site of Action
By Crop
By Species
By Country
By Individual Herbicide
Membership
Register
Retrieve Your Password
Edit Your Contact Details
Change Your Password
Contacts
Researchers
Contact Us
Search the Herbicide-Resistance Reference Database
Searches the reference database - authors, title, abstract, and keywords fields. Not case sensitive.
You can use
AND, OR, AND NOT
operators. For instance :
Tranel and Amaranthus and not glyphosate
REFERENCES
1
Page size:
select
5
10
20
50
Page:
of 1
Items
1
to
1
of
1
Botha, G. M. ; Burgos, N. R. ; Gbur, E. E. ; Alcober, E. A. ; Salas, R. A. ; Scott, R. C.
.
2014
.
Interaction of glufosinate with 2,4-D, dicamba, and tembotrione on glyphosate-resistant
Amaranthus palmeri
.
American Journal of Experimental Agriculture
4
:
427 - 442
.
Aims: Glyphosate-resistant
Amaranthus palmeri
S. Wats. (Palmer amaranth) is a major threat to crops in the southern USA. Experiments were conducted to evaluate differential tolerance to 2,4-D, dicamba, and tembotrione and interaction with glufosinate for glyphosate-resistant (GR)
A. palmeri
control. Study Design: The differential tolerance experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with a split-plot arrangement of treatments with herbicide as mainplot and
A. palmeri
population as subplot. The herbicide interaction experiment was conducted in RCBD with factorial arrangement of treatments. Place and Duration of Study: University of Arkansas-Fayetteville, USA. Tolerance experiments were conducted in October-November 2010 and in July-August 2011. Herbicide interaction experiments were conducted in the greenhouse in June-July 2011 and August-September 2011 and in the field in April-August 2012. Methodology: Differential tolerance to alternative herbicides was evaluated using 12 GR-
A. palmeri
populations. Herbicide treatments were 1.06 kg ae/ha 2,4-D, 0.56 kg ae/ha dicamba, and 0.094 kg ai/ha tembotrione. In the herbicide interaction study, glufosinate at 0.18, 0.36, and 0.73 kg ai/ha were mixed with either 0.024, 0.047, and 0.094 kg ai/ha tembotrione; 0.28, 0.56, and 1.12 kg ae/ha 2,4-D; or 0.28 and 0.56 kg ae/ha dicamba. The population used was PRA-C. Results: In the tolerance experiment, 2,4-D at 1× (1.06 kg ae/ha) killed 96-100% of plants per population. Dicamba at 1× (0.56 kg ae/ha) killed 36-94% of plants per population, with survivors sustaining 80-99% injury. Tembotrione at 1× (0.094 kg ai/ha) caused 49-98% mortality per population with survivors incurring 80-99% injury. In the herbicide interaction experiment, mixing half doses of glufosinate and 2,4-D resulted in 100% control of PRA-C in the greenhouse and field. At 1×, glufosinate controlled PRA-C 91% in the field; the addition of 0.5× or 1× of 2,4-D or 1× of dicamba resulted in 100% control. Conclusion: In the field, 2,4-D was most effective on GR-
A. palmeri
, relative to dicamba and tembotrione. Some populations have a high risk of being selected for resistance to dicamba, glufosinate, and tembotrione. Glufosinate+2,4-D mixtures were additive and at sublethal doses, synergistic. Most combinations of glufosinate and tembotrione were antagonistic.
1
Page size:
select
5
10
20
50
Page:
of 1
Items
1
to
1
of
1
PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FIRST if you intend to base a significant portion of a scientific paper on data derived from this site.
Cite this site as:
Heap, I. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Online. Internet.
Wednesday, October 9, 2024
. Available
www.weedscience.org
Copyright � 1993-
2024
WeedScience.org All rights reserved. Fair use of this material is encouraged. Proper citation is requested.
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##